Wimbledon 2020: The star-studded finals that never happened

By Sports Desk July 11, 2020

Tennis lovers worldwide should have been licking their lips in anticipation of the Wimbledon finals this weekend.

There were two contrasting singles championship matches last year, Simona Halep dismantling Serena Williams before Novak Djokovic got the better of Roger Federer in an epic marathon five-set thriller.

Centre Court crowds and millions watching all over the planet have been treated to classic finals over the years, but there have also been showdowns that many would have expected to see that never transpired.

While there was no 2020 grass-court grand slam this year due to the coronavirus pandemic, we look at a selection of finals that never occurred at the All England Club for one reason or another.

 

Steffi Graf v Martina Hingis

Graf and Hingis met twice at SW19 but the latest round in which they did battle was for a place in the quarter-finals.

German legend Graf was unable to go for a third consecutive Wimbledon title in 1997 due to injury and it was Swiss sensation Hingis who lifted the Venus Rosewater Dish for the first and only time, defeating Jana Novotna.

Novotna gained revenge by dumping Hingis out at the semi-final stage 12 months later after Graf - 12 years older than Hingis - was beaten by Natasha Zvereva in the third round.

Hingis never went beyond the quarter-finals after that, while in 1999 Graf fell to Lindsay Davenport in her last appearance at a tournament she won seven times.

 

John McEnroe v Boris Becker

McEnroe and Becker have shared a commentary box at Wimbledon, but they were never on the opposite side of the net in a final.

A packed crowd would have most certainly been on the edge of their seats to watch two of the most colourful characters in the sport throw everything at each other in pursuit of major glory, but it was not to be.

The closest it came to materialising was in 1989, when American legend McEnroe was denied a place in the final by Stefan Edberg.

Becker beat Edberg in the final to take the title for a third and last time. They may well have met in a final if McEnroe had not missed the 1986 tournament due to taking a break from the sport or suffered a back injury the following year.

 

Justine Henin v Kim Clijsters

Belgium would have surely come to a standstill if Henin and Clijsters had graced Centre Court in a final.

Henin won seven grand slam titles before retiring in 2008 aged only 25 and although she made a comeback in 2010, the former world number one called it a day again the following year as she struggled with an elbow injury.

She quit as a two-time Wimbledon runner-up, while Clijsters - who announced she was making a surprise comeback last year - has never reached the final at SW19.

Semi-final appearances in 2003 and 2006 are as far as Clijsters has been at Wimbledon, and it is a great shame the four-time major singles winner and her compatriot never contested a battle of Belgium for one of the biggest prizes in sport at the peak of their powers.

 

Andy Murray v Rafael Nadal

There have been 24 matches contested by Murray and Nadal, with three of those staged at Wimbledon.

Nadal broke the hearts of Murray fans by beating him on each occasion at his home grand slam, twice in the semi-finals and once in the last eight 12 years ago.

You have to go back to 2011 for Spanish legend Nadal's last appearance in a Wimbledon final, while Murray was crowned champion four years ago but has not played in the tournament since 2017 due to career-threatening hip injury.

While a fit-again Murray is hoping to work his way back to the top and Nadal remains a huge force, time is not on their side and it appears unlikely they will be opponents in a Wimbledon final.

Related items

  • Atalanta v PSG: The battle of the Champions League's great entertainers Atalanta v PSG: The battle of the Champions League's great entertainers

    It might not have been planned, but the events of 2020 have produced a version of the Champions League knockout phase that could well be a breath of fresh air.

    In exchange for traditional heavyweights going head-to-head over two legs, the quarter-finals will each consist of one match, in the neutral surroundings of Lisbon.

    What's more, six of the eight teams have never won the tournament, including Atalanta and Paris Saint-Germain.

    They're not really comparable for their approaches off the pitch: Atalanta's record signing, Luis Muriel, cost less than a 10th of the fee PSG paid for Neymar. Still, these are two teams going toe-to-toe this season when it comes to entertainment value.

    Using Opta data, we examine why Atalanta versus PSG could be a truly spectacular showdown - and why the potential absence of two star names could spell major trouble...

    GUNG-HO OR GO HOME

    At PSG, Thomas Tuchel is under pressure to deliver attacking as well as winning football, in the Champions League more than anywhere else. Atalanta just seem to know no other approach.

    Only Bayern Munich (31) have scored more goals in this season's competition than PSG (20), and Atalanta are only four goals back.

    Of the teams left in the tournament, Bayern (23.23) have the best minutes-per-goal rate. PSG are second on 36, with Atalanta third on 45.

    PSG's knack for scoring should come as little surprise since they have the best shooting accuracy (26.32 per cent) of all the quarter-finalists. Atalanta are strangely much lower down at 17.58, although that's perhaps a figure that is skewed by their number of attempts: they have managed 80 shots inside the box compared to PSG's 42, and 28 outside the area, with PSG on 29.

    PSG also benefit from a high number of big chances created (31), with only Bayern (37) and Manchester City (38) creating more. Atalanta are fourth on that list (26), but for overall chances created, they are better than PSG - they have carved out 81 openings, 10 more than the Ligue 1 champions.

    ANY CASE FOR THE DEFENCE?

    Perhaps Atalanta have little choice but to keep things on the front foot. They have only kept two clean sheets in their eight games this term and have conceded 16, which is more than any other remaining side.

    PSG, meanwhile, have kept more clean sheets (six) and conceded fewer goals (four) than anyone else. It seems that, when necessary, they know how to sure things up. Having said that, they have faced 97 shots this term, which is just four fewer than Atalanta, so perhaps luck - and goalkeeper Keylor Navas - have been on their side.

    Attacking football might be a given on Wednesday, but these are still teams who know how to disrupt. PSG have won 118 free-kicks in this term's competition, more than any other quarter-finalist and 24 more than Atalanta. Additionally, Atalanta have conceded 123 free-kicks, the most of any team in this season's tournament. Check your shin pads, Neymar.

    ILICIC, MBAPPE AND FEARS OF OVER-RELIANCE

    Kylian Mbappe is battling to recover full fitness after having injured his ankle in the Coupe de France final win over Saint-Etienne.

    It looks likely that the France forward will be able at least to be on the bench for PSG, but Atalanta have no such luck when it comes to Josip Ilicic, who is definitely missing Wednesday game due to a personal matter.

    Mbappe and Ilicic have each scored five goals in this season's Champions League, the latter getting all four in the last-16 second leg win over Valencia. Mbappe has four assists to boot, having created five big chances, two more than Ilicic.

    Both have been involved in more goals for their respective sides than any other player, but the loss of Ilicic - playing the best football of his career at the age of 32 - looks like being a far more damaging blow.

    Ilicic has a big chance conversion rate of 80 per cent, a shooting accuracy of 81.82 per cent, and has completed 83.05 per cent of passes ending in the final third. All of these are leading figures for Atalanta this season.

    He has also completed 21 dribbles, again the best of anyone in Gian Piero Gasperini's side and 11 more than Mbappe has managed.

  • Serena to face Venus as Stephens' struggles continue Serena to face Venus as Stephens' struggles continue

    Serena Williams will face sister Venus in the Top Seed Open second round after contrasting wins on Tuesday.

    In action for the first time since the WTA Tour season was suspended in March due to the coronavirus pandemic, Serena edged past Bernarda Pera.

    The top seed at the WTA International event, Serena recorded a 4-6 6-4 6-1 victory after being five points from defeat.

    The 23-time grand slam champion raced through the final set, losing just seven points on serve to advance in Lexington.

    Awaiting Serena in the second round is Venus, who was too good for Victoria Azarenka 6-3 6-2.

    The sisters will meet for the 31st time, with Serena holding an 18-12 win-loss record over Venus.

    Sloane Stephens had endured a tough start to 2020 before the season was suspended, and the 2017 US Open champion suffered another loss.

    The seventh seed was well beaten by qualifier Leylah Fernandez 6-3 6-3 to slip to a 1-6 win-loss record this year.

    The only other seed in action was Yulia Putintseva, who brushed past Ajla Tomljanovic 6-0 6-4.

    Coco Gauff, 16, was pushed in her opener, overcoming Caroline Dolehide 7-5 7-5.

    CiCi Bellis, Shelby Rogers, Jil Teichmann, Anna Blinkova and Olga Govortsova also advanced.

  • Serena Williams makes winning return in three-set battle with Pera Serena Williams makes winning return in three-set battle with Pera

    Serena Williams needed three sets to defeat Bernarda Pera at the Top Seed Open on Tuesday in her first match since February.

    The 23-time grand slam singles champion came from a set down to beat her compatriot 4-6 6-4 6-1 in two hours and 16 minutes in Lexington.

    Williams' previous match was in the Fed Cup clash with Latvia in February, while she has not played a tournament match since January's Australian Open, the WTA Tour having been shut down since early match due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    World number 60 Pera broke in the fifth game and fought off two break points on her own serve before a thumping winner sealed the first set.

    Williams saw a 3-1 lead pegged back in the second and saved four break points to deny Pera the chance to serve for the match, but the 38-year-old found some of her famous fighting spirit to level the match after forcing a Pera error.

    She then made comparatively light work of the decider to set up a second-round clash with either Victoria Azarenka or sister Venus Williams.

    "I've been practicing really well and I wasn't getting a good rhythm out here, and I just kept thinking, 'Serena, play like you've been practicing'," she said afterwards.

    "I knew I could play a little bit better if I just hung in there.

    "I feel like I always play Venus first or second round, every tournament, so that's annoying. And I always play Vika early, so we'll see."

© 2020 SportsMaxTV All Rights Reserved.